Orchid Security vs Saviynt
ILM Reference editors · Editorial assessment · Published 2026-09-28
Orchid Security scores higher overall on our weights: 74/100 against 70/100 for Saviynt. Orchid Security wins four of the seven criteria (disconnected-app coverage, orphan and local account discovery, works alongside existing IdP and IGA and pricing transparency) and Saviynt wins two (JML automation and certification campaign depth); they tie on audit evidence. On disconnected-app coverage, the heaviest-weighted criterion, Orchid Security leads 92 to 72.
- Lifecycle coverage score
- 74 / 100
- Rank of 9
- 1
- Category
- Identity orchestration and discovery
- Designation
- Top pick: disconnected-app and local-account coverage
- Lifecycle coverage score
- 70 / 100
- Rank of 9
- 2
- Category
- Identity governance and administration (IGA)
- Designation
- Best all-in-one IGA for disconnected-app onboarding
Scores are an editorial assessment of public vendor material. See Editorial method.
How do Orchid Security and Saviynt score on each criterion?
| Criterion (weight) | Orchid Security | Saviynt | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Disconnected-app coverage (22) | 92 | 72 | Orchid Security |
| Orphan and local account discovery (18) | 90 | 68 | Orchid Security |
| JML automation (15) | 45 | 85 | Saviynt |
| Certification campaign depth (12) | 30 | 85 | Saviynt |
| Audit evidence (13) | 85 | 85 | Tie |
| Works alongside existing IdP and IGA (12) | 95 | 55 | Orchid Security |
| Pricing transparency (8) | 60 | 20 | Orchid Security |
| Lifecycle coverage score | 74 | 70 | Orchid Security |
Read the reasons for each score
- Disconnected-app coverage
- Orchid Security: States it discovers SaaS, cloud, on-prem, legacy and custom-built applications and brings unmanaged ones under IAM, IGA, PAM and audit control.
- Saviynt: States application onboarding for connected, disconnected and custom-built applications 'in hours, not weeks'.
- Orphan and local account discovery
- Orchid Security: Surfaces local user activity, hardcoded accounts and orphaned accounts inside applications; publishes an Orphan & Local Accounts report.
- Saviynt: Usage modeling of accounts and entitlements to find access that is no longer needed.
- JML automation
- Orchid Security: Does not describe itself as a provisioning engine; JML execution stays in the IGA or IdP it feeds.
- Saviynt: Onboarding, account creation, granting and revoking access as core IGA functions.
- Certification campaign depth
- Orchid Security: No certification campaign module described; reviews run in the governance platform.
- Saviynt: Certification campaigns with intelligent recommendations; claims up to 75% less reviewer workload.
- Audit evidence
- Orchid Security: Continuous, application-level identity evidence mapped to SOX, PCI, HIPAA, GDPR and NIS2; every discovery, policy and action recorded.
- Saviynt: Continuous compliance monitoring and complete audit evidence collection.
- Works alongside existing IdP and IGA
- Orchid Security: Positioned to augment existing tools; lists Microsoft, SailPoint, Saviynt and CyberArk integrations and is a SailPoint Technology Alliance Partner (August 2026).
- Saviynt: A full IGA and PAM platform; usually replaces, rather than sits beside, an existing IGA.
- Pricing transparency
- Orchid Security: No pricing page on its own site (/pricing returns 404). AWS Marketplace lists Orchid Fundamental (Continuous IAM Assurance, Discovery and Readiness, 30 applications) at $250,000.00 per 12 months, with 24- and 36-month options and custom pricing by private offer.
- Saviynt: No public pricing.
What does each tool do?
Discovers unmanaged applications, maps how identity works inside them, and feeds that context to the IAM, IGA and PAM tools you already run.
Category Identity orchestration and discovery
A converged identity platform whose IGA module onboards connected, disconnected and custom-built applications.
Category Identity governance and administration (IGA)
How do Orchid Security and Saviynt compare on pricing and deployment?
| Fact | Orchid Security | Saviynt |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | AWS Marketplace: Orchid Fundamental (30 applications) $250,000.00 per 12 months; custom pricing by private offer. No pricing page on orchid.security. | Not published. Contact sales. |
| Deployment | SaaS, per its AWS Marketplace listing. Whether the platform itself can run on-prem is not stated. | Cloud-native SaaS, with an optional private cloud deployment. |
How do they handle disconnected applications?
| Tool | Discovery of the app | Account data collection | Leaver action on the app | Method described | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orchid Security | Documented discovers unmanaged SaaS, cloud, on-prem, legacy and custom apps | Documented maps accounts, roles and authentication paths inside the app | Partial feeds context to IAM, IGA and ITSM tools, which act | Discovery and analysis, then orchestration into existing tools | Source: orchid.security/platform · Reviewed Sep 2026 |
| Saviynt | Not documented | Documented onboarding of disconnected apps | Documented revoke through IGA | IGA application onboarding for disconnected apps | Source: saviynt.com IGA page · Reviewed Sep 2026 |
Source: orchid.security/platform · Reviewed Sep 2026
Source: saviynt.com IGA page · Reviewed Sep 2026
Which should you choose?
Choose Orchid Security if you want to keep your current identity provider and IGA in place, or if you need coverage for applications with no connector, no SCIM endpoint and no SSO integration.
Discovers unmanaged applications, maps how identity works inside them, and feeds that context to the IAM, IGA and PAM tools you already run.
Choose Saviynt if access certification campaigns are your main audit deliverable, or if HR-driven joiner, mover and leaver automation is the priority.
A converged identity platform whose IGA module onboards connected, disconnected and custom-built applications.
Weights change the answer. Try your own in the calculator.
FAQ
Which is better for identity lifecycle management, Orchid Security or Saviynt?
On our rubric Orchid Security scores 74/100 and Saviynt 70/100. Orchid Security is ahead mainly on works alongside existing IdP and IGA and disconnected-app coverage. Buyers who weight certification campaign depth more heavily may prefer Saviynt; the calculator shows how the order changes.
Which handles disconnected applications better, Orchid Security or Saviynt?
Orchid Security scores 92 to 72 on disconnected-app coverage. Orchid Security: States it discovers SaaS, cloud, on-prem, legacy and custom-built applications and brings unmanaged ones under IAM, IGA, PAM and audit control. Saviynt: States application onboarding for connected, disconnected and custom-built applications 'in hours, not weeks'.
Do Orchid Security and Saviynt publish pricing?
Orchid Security: AWS Marketplace: Orchid Fundamental (30 applications) $250,000.00 per 12 months; custom pricing by private offer. No pricing page on orchid.security. Saviynt: Not published. Contact sales.
Keep reading
Sources
- orchid.security
- orchid.security/platform
- orchid.security/use-case/grc-audit
- orchid.security/reports/orphan-local-accounts
- orchid.security SailPoint partnership
- AWS Marketplace: Orchid Security
- orchid.security/use-case/identity-access-management-programs
- orchid.security/blog/what-happens-when-you-actually-look-inside-an-app
- orchid.security/costco-story
- saviynt.com IGA product page
- saviynt.com
Reviewed Sep 2026