REGISTER REVISED SEPTEMBER 2026

Lumos vs Orchid Security

ILM Reference editors · Editorial assessment · Published 2026-09-28

SUMMARYREV. 2026-09

Orchid Security scores higher overall on our weights: 71/100 against 62/100 for Lumos. Lumos wins two of the seven criteria (JML automation and certification campaign depth) and Orchid Security wins four (disconnected-app coverage, orphan and local account discovery, audit evidence and works alongside existing IdP and IGA); they tie on pricing transparency. On disconnected-app coverage, the heaviest-weighted criterion, Orchid Security leads 92 to 50.

RECORD · LUMOS VS ORCHID SECURITYREV. 2026-09

Lumos

Lifecycle coverage score
Rank of 8
7
Category
Identity governance and administration (IGA)
Designation
Best for SaaS-heavy JML and license reclamation

Orchid Security

Lifecycle coverage score
Rank of 8
1
Category
Identity orchestration and discovery
Designation
Top pick: disconnected-app and local-account coverage

Scores are an editorial assessment of public vendor material. See Editorial method.

How do Lumos and Orchid Security score on each criterion?

Criterion scores (0-100), editorial assessment, with the winner per row computed from the scores.
Criterion (weight)LumosOrchid SecurityWinner
Disconnected-app coverage (22)5092Orchid Security
Orphan and local account discovery (18)6290Orchid Security
JML automation (15)8045Lumos
Certification campaign depth (12)7230Lumos
Audit evidence (13)7085Orchid Security
Works alongside existing IdP and IGA (12)7095Orchid Security
Pricing transparency (8)2020Tie
Lifecycle coverage score6271Orchid Security
Read the reasons for each score
Disconnected-app coverage
Lumos: Revocation described across local accounts, custom and on-prem apps; handling of apps with no API not detailed.
Orchid Security: States it discovers SaaS, cloud, on-prem, legacy and custom-built applications and brings unmanaged ones under IAM, IGA, PAM and audit control.
Orphan and local account discovery
Lumos: Identity analytics surfaces dormant accounts and shadow IT.
Orchid Security: Surfaces local user activity, hardcoded accounts and orphaned accounts inside applications; publishes an Orphan & Local Accounts report.
JML automation
Lumos: HRIS-triggered joiner, mover and leaver workflows; leavers offboarded with licenses reclaimed.
Orchid Security: Does not describe itself as a provisioning engine; JML execution stays in the IGA or IdP it feeds.
Certification campaign depth
Lumos: Agents scope reviews, certify straightforward items and prepare audit-ready documentation.
Orchid Security: No certification campaign module described; reviews run in the governance platform.
Audit evidence
Lumos: Full audit trail of every grant and revocation.
Orchid Security: Continuous, application-level identity evidence mapped to SOX, PCI, HIPAA, GDPR and NIS2; every discovery, policy and action recorded.
Works alongside existing IdP and IGA
Lumos: Works across the IdP, HRIS, SaaS and cloud stack already in place.
Orchid Security: Positioned to augment existing tools; lists Microsoft, SailPoint, Saviynt and CyberArk integrations and is a SailPoint Technology Alliance Partner (August 2026).
Pricing transparency
Lumos: No public prices.
Orchid Security: No public pricing; demo request only.

What does each tool do?

LUMOSREV. 2026-09

Lumos

Agent-driven identity governance with HRIS-triggered lifecycle, access reviews and identity analytics across 300+ integrations.

Category Identity governance and administration (IGA)

ORCHID SECURITYREV. 2026-09

Orchid Security

Discovers unmanaged applications, maps how identity works inside them, and feeds that context to the IAM, IGA and PAM tools you already run.

Category Identity orchestration and discovery

How do Lumos and Orchid Security compare on pricing and deployment?

Published pricing and deployment, as stated on vendor pages reviewed September 2026.
FactLumosOrchid Security
PricingNot published. Contact sales.Not published. Contact sales.
DeploymentSaaS.Not published in detail on public pages. Confirm with the vendor.

How do they handle disconnected applications?

Disconnected-App Coverage Ledger, September 2026. What each vendor's public pages describe for an application with no connector, no SCIM endpoint and no SSO integration.
ToolDiscovery of the appAccount data collectionLeaver action on the appMethod describedSource
Orchid SecurityDocumented discovers unmanaged SaaS, cloud, on-prem, legacy and custom appsDocumented maps accounts, roles and authentication paths inside the appPartial feeds context to IAM, IGA and ITSM tools, which actDiscovery and analysis, then orchestration into existing toolsSource: orchid.security/platform · Reviewed Sep 2026
LumosPartial shadow IT in identity analyticsNot documentedPartial revocation across local accounts, custom and on-prem appsIntegrations; no-API handling not detailedSource: lumos.com lifecycle page · Reviewed Sep 2026

Source: orchid.security/platform · Reviewed Sep 2026

Source: lumos.com lifecycle page · Reviewed Sep 2026

Which should you choose?

CHOOSE LUMOS IFREV. 2026-09

Choose Lumos if HR-driven joiner, mover and leaver automation is the priority, or if access certification campaigns are your main audit deliverable.

Agent-driven identity governance with HRIS-triggered lifecycle, access reviews and identity analytics across 300+ integrations.

CHOOSE ORCHID SECURITY IFREV. 2026-09

Choose Orchid Security if you need coverage for applications with no connector, no SCIM endpoint and no SSO integration, or if finding orphan, dormant and local accounts is the priority.

Discovers unmanaged applications, maps how identity works inside them, and feeds that context to the IAM, IGA and PAM tools you already run.

Weights change the answer. Try your own in the calculator.

FAQ

Which is better for identity lifecycle management, Lumos or Orchid Security?

On our rubric Orchid Security scores 71/100 and Lumos 62/100. Orchid Security is ahead mainly on disconnected-app coverage and orphan and local account discovery. Buyers who weight JML automation more heavily may prefer Lumos; the calculator shows how the order changes.

Which handles disconnected applications better, Lumos or Orchid Security?

Orchid Security scores 92 to 50 on disconnected-app coverage. Lumos: Revocation described across local accounts, custom and on-prem apps; handling of apps with no API not detailed. Orchid Security: States it discovers SaaS, cloud, on-prem, legacy and custom-built applications and brings unmanaged ones under IAM, IGA, PAM and audit control.

Do Lumos and Orchid Security publish pricing?

Lumos: Not published. Contact sales. Orchid Security: Not published. Contact sales.

Keep reading

ALTERNATIVESREV. 2026-09
ALTERNATIVESREV. 2026-09
PROFILEREV. 2026-09
PROFILEREV. 2026-09

Sources

Reviewed Sep 2026